Thanks to my sponsors: Mason Ginter, Lennart Oldenburg, Mario Fleischhacker, Jacob Cheriathundam, Garret Kelly, Egor Ternovoi, Matthew T, Ian McLinden, Josiah Bull, Pete Bevin, Lev Khoroshansky, Enrico Zschemisch, Adam Gutglick, Julian Schmid, C J Silverio, Ives van Hoorne, Marty Penner, Lena Schönburg, Andy Gocke, compwhizii and 230 more
Async fn in trait... not
👋 This page was last updated ~2 years ago. Just so you know.
Async fn in trait... not
I was planning on showing the in-progress async_fn_in_trait
feature in the
context of my website, but it turns out, I can't!
My website uses two databases: one local SQLite database for content, and a shared Postgres database for user credentials, preferences etc. Migrations are run on startup, and each migration implements one of the following traits:
#[async_trait::async_trait]
pub trait MigrationSqlite {
fn tag(&self) -> &'static str;
async fn up(&self, db: &mut Transaction<Sqlite>) -> Result<()>;
}
#[async_trait::async_trait]
pub trait MigrationPostgres {
fn tag(&self) -> &'static str;
async fn up(&self, db: &mut Transaction<Postgres>) -> Result<()>;
}
...which can have async
functions thanks to the
async-trait crate.
Enabling the unstable feature works for the trait definition:
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
#![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
pub trait MigrationPostgres {
fn tag(&self) -> &'static str;
async fn up(&self, db: &mut Transaction<Postgres>) -> Result<()>;
}
...but fails later, because I'm making a Vec
of migrations, to pass to:
pub async fn migrate_all_postgres(
db: &PgPool,
wanted_list: Vec<Box<dyn MigrationPostgres>>,
) -> Result<()> {
// (cut)
}
...and traits with async fns (the real thing) aren't trait-object-safe for now:
$ cargo check
Checking futile-db v0.1.0 (/home/amos/bearcove/futile/crates/futile-db)
(cut)
error[E0038]: the trait `MigrationPostgres` cannot be made into an object
--> crates/futile-db/src/lib.rs:64:47
|
64 | async fn mk_postgres_pool(migrations: Vec<Box<dyn MigrationPostgres>>) -> Result<sqlx::PgPool> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `MigrationPostgres` cannot be made into an object
|
note: for a trait to be "object safe" it needs to allow building a vtable to allow the call to be resolvable dynamically; for more information visit <https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/traits.html#object-safety>
--> crates/futile-db/src/migrations/mod.rs:135:14
|
133 | pub trait MigrationPostgres {
| ----------------- this trait cannot be made into an object...
134 | fn tag(&self) -> &'static str;
135 | async fn up(&self, db: &mut Transaction<Postgres>) -> Result<()>;
| ^^ ...because method `up` references an `impl Trait` type in its return type
= help: consider moving `up` to another trait
error[E0038]: the trait `MigrationPostgres` cannot be made into an object
--> crates/futile-db/src/migrations/mod.rs:71:26
|
71 | wanted_list: Vec<Box<dyn MigrationPostgres>>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `MigrationPostgres` cannot be made into an object
|
note: for a trait to be "object safe" it needs to allow building a vtable to allow the call to be resolvable dynamically; for more information visit <https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/traits.html#object-safety>
--> crates/futile-db/src/migrations/mod.rs:135:14
|
133 | pub trait MigrationPostgres {
| ----------------- this trait cannot be made into an object...
134 | fn tag(&self) -> &'static str;
135 | async fn up(&self, db: &mut Transaction<Postgres>) -> Result<()>;
| ^^ ...because method `up` references an `impl Trait` type in its return type
= help: consider moving `up` to another trait
(cut)
There is a very good reason for that limitation, and I hear, to lift it,
something like dyn*
(which is very hard to search for) is needed.
So, instead, I'll show them what I did for
hring, to get an "owned" version of the
AsyncRead
/ AsyncWrite
traits, that is io-uring-friendly:
pub trait ReadOwned {
async fn read<B: IoBufMut>(&self, buf: B) -> BufResult<usize, B>;
}
pub trait WriteOwned {
async fn write<B: IoBuf>(&self, buf: B) -> BufResult<usize, B>;
async fn writev<B: IoBuf>(&self, list: Vec<B>) -> BufResult<usize, Vec<B>> {
let mut out_list = Vec::with_capacity(list.len());
let mut list = list.into_iter();
let mut total = 0;
while let Some(buf) = list.next() {
let (res, buf) = self.write(buf).await;
out_list.push(buf);
match res {
Ok(n) => total += n,
Err(e) => {
out_list.extend(list);
return (Err(e), out_list);
}
}
}
(Ok(total), out_list)
}
async fn write_all<B: IoBuf>(&self, mut buf: B) -> BufResult<(), B> {
let mut written = 0;
let len = buf.bytes_init();
while written < len {
let (res, slice) = self.write(buf.slice(written..len)).await;
buf = slice.into_inner();
let n = match res {
Ok(n) => n,
Err(e) => return (Err(e), buf),
};
written += n;
}
(Ok(()), buf)
}
}
pub trait ReadWriteOwned: ReadOwned + WriteOwned {}
impl<T> ReadWriteOwned for T where T: ReadOwned + WriteOwned {}
This all works flawlessly. Here's the implementation for
tokio-uring's TcpStream
type:
impl ReadOwned for TcpStream {
async fn read<B: IoBufMut>(&self, buf: B) -> BufResult<usize, B> {
TcpStream::read(self, buf).await
}
}
impl WriteOwned for TcpStream {
async fn write<B: IoBuf>(&self, buf: B) -> BufResult<usize, B> {
TcpStream::write(self, buf).await
}
async fn writev<B: IoBuf>(&self, list: Vec<B>) -> BufResult<usize, Vec<B>> {
TcpStream::writev(self, list).await
}
}
(It's trivial, since the trait is closely modelled after tokio-uring's own types).
Object trait safety is still an issue here, but we can work around it by making
most functions take an &impl ReadOwned
instead of a &dyn ReadOwned
, which
makes the function generic (which means it'll be monomorphized, which in turns
means the binary will be larger, but there won't be dynamic dispatch at all):
/// Returns `None` on EOF, error if partially parsed message.
pub(crate) async fn read_and_parse<Parser, Output>(
parser: Parser,
// 👇
stream: &impl ReadOwned,
mut buf: RollMut,
max_len: usize,
) -> eyre::Result<Option<(RollMut, Output)>>
where
Parser: Fn(Roll) -> IResult<Roll, Output>,
{
// cut
}
The rest of the hring API is carefully designed to work around that limitation for now, which is... a bit of a balancing act, but it works!
Here's another article just for you:
My ideal Rust workflow
Writing Rust is pretty neat. But you know what's even neater? Continuously testing Rust, releasing Rust, and eventually, shipping Rust to production. And for that, we want more than plug-in for a code editor.
We want... a workflow.
Why I specifically care about this
Cool bear's hot tip
This gets pretty long, so if all you want is the advice, feel free to directly.