Articles tagged #linux
A terminal case of Linux
Has this ever happened to you?
You want to look at a JSON file in your terminal, so you pipe it into jq so you can look at it with colors and stuff.
That’s a useless use of cat.
…oh hey cool bear. No warm-up today huh.
Sure, fine, okay, I’ll read the darn man page for jq
… okay it takes
a “filter” and then some files. And the filter we want is.. .
which, just
like files, means “the current thing”:
Fine, we'll relocate our own binary!
Welcome back to the eighteenth and final part of “Making our own executable packer”.
In the last article, we had
a lot of fun. We already had a “packer” executable, minipak
, which joined
together stage1
(a launcher), and a compressed version of whichever executable
we wanted to pack.
What we added, was a whole bunch of abstractions to parse ELF headers using
deku, which we used from stage1
to be able to
launch the guest executable from memory, instead of writing it to a file and
using execve
on it.
Running a self-relocatable ELF from memory
Welcome back!
In the last article, we
did foundational work on minipak
, our ELF packer.
It is now able to receive command-line arguments, environment variables, and
auxiliary vectors. It can parse those command-line arguments into a set of
options. It can make an ELF file smaller using the LZ4 compression
algorithm, and pack
it together with stage1
, our launcher.
Everything but ELF
And we’re back!
In the last article, we thanked our old code and bade it adieu, for it did not spark joy. And then we made a new, solid foundation, on which we planned to actually make an executable packer.
As part of this endeavor, we’ve made a crate called encore
, which only
depends on libcore
, and provides some of the things libstd
would give us,
but which we cannot have, because we do not want to rely on a libc.
Between libcore and libstd
You’re still here! Fantastic.
I have good news, and bad news. The good news is, we’re actually going to make an executable packer now!
Hurray!
I know right? No lie, we’re actually really going to start working on the final product from this point onwards.
What uhhh what about the previous fourteen parts?
Ah, yes, the previous fourteen parts. Well, we had fun, didn’t we? And we learned a lot about ELF, how it’s basically a database format that different tools look at in different ways, how it’s mapped in memory (more or less), what we really need to set up before starting up another executable, all that good stuff.
In the bowels of glibc
Good morning, and welcome back to “how many executables can we run with our custom dynamic loader before things get really out of control”.
In Part 13, we “implemented” thread-local storage. I’m using scare quotes because, well, we spent most of the article blabbering about Addressing Memory Through The Ages, And Other Fun Tidbits.
But that was then, and this is now, which is, uh, nine months later. Not only am I wiser and more productive, I’m also finally done updating all the previous thirteen parts of this series to fix some inconsistencies, upgrade crate versions, and redo all the diagrams as SVG.
weMaking our own executable packer
In this series, we’ll attempt to understand how Linux executables are organized, how they are executed, and how to make a program that takes an executable fresh off the linker and compresses it - just because we can.
A dynamic linker murder mystery
I write a ton of articles about rust. And in those articles, the main focus is about writing Rust code that compiles. Once it compiles, well, we’re basically in the clear! Especially if it compiles to a single executable, that’s made up entirely of Rust code.
That works great for short tutorials, or one-off explorations.
Unfortunately, “in the real world”, our code often has to share the stage with other code. And Rust is great at that. Compiling Go code to a static library, for example, is relatively finnicky. It insists on being built with GCC (and no other compiler), and linked with GNU ld (and no other linker).
notGo back to the homepage.